|
|
1. Gambling is a skill.
2. Skills have different levels.
3. Using low-level gambling strategies will inevitably result in "returning to square one" overnight.
4. There are many types of low-level gambling strategies. The commonality is that they all lead to inevitable losses; the difference lies in how early or late the losses occur.
5. One prominent characteristic of low-level gambling strategies is that the goal is to recover losses.
6. The arch-enemy of low-level gambling strategies is the death chart.
7. As the saying goes, there is no endless winning in gambling. This implies that due to the inevitability of the death chart, discontinuing a strategy is inevitable. Who can guarantee that betting on the banker for one hand or the next few hands won't result in a player betting on the player, and vice versa?
8. High-level gambling strategies originate from dual-winning thinking.
9. The dual-winning thinking of gambling strategies is expressed as follows: If the strategy continues, I win; if the strategy stops, I also win; in other words, whether the strategy continues or stops, I win.
10. When thinking about gambling strategies, the purpose of continuing the strategy should be clarified. The purpose of gambling is not to recover losses but to rewrite the death chart.
11. Due to the inevitable discontinuation of low-level gambling strategies, many practitioners abandon them reluctantly, driven by panic.
12. High-level gambling strategies seem to be indifferent to the continuation or discontinuation of the strategy. It is another kind of joy on a different level.
13. The statement "If the strategy continues, I win; if the strategy stops, I also win" can indeed exist. The basis for its existence is a positive winning rate.
14. Communication requires a platform with different levels. Understanding the "dual-winning gambling strategy" may require a bit of fate. If it is destined, we will meet from afar. If the conversation doesn't click, it's better to have half a sentence less.
15. In response to Mr. 007007, I would like to add:
- Your thought direction is correct and has some similarities to "dual-winning thinking."
- However, "Double Dragon Entering the Sea" is by no means "dual-winning thinking."
- Hopefully, the following analysis will be helpful to you:
- The win rate ratio of three-style gambling is 7:1. Under the condition of winning 7 and losing 1, three-style gambling has a negative winning rate.
- If "Double Dragon" cannot rewrite the death chart, then "Double Dragon Entering the Sea" cannot "dual-win," and losing is just a matter of time.
- Deliberately "avoiding the death trap" is unavoidable. Some people intentionally reverse their losing streaks, and the results may be a reversal of their original winning streak.
- Sometimes, the appearance of the "death trap" has a long cyclical nature. For example, the appearance rate of 5 banker - 5 player - 5 banker - 5 player is at least 1 in 15,000 occurrences. Therefore, one should not be obsessed with "stable winning streaks of more than 5 shoes."
- When the "death trap" appears (PBPB BPBP), betting with the three-style strategy may not necessarily result in a loss and might approach an alternative outcome.
- Best wishes for your success!
- Note: The terms "win" and "win rate" refer to the outcome of the betting strategy, while "win" and "win rate" refer to the capital's overall gain or loss. "Win" is a simple concept, while "win" is a compound concept. |
|
Post time 15-1-2024 20:53:23