|
|
Edited by Kapil334 at 23-12-2023 04:51 AM
Everyone has their own habits when it comes to gambling, and they develop their own style. Some people's styles may change, and among them, there's a style I believe that resonates with a portion of individuals. That style is ""better to be lacking than to be excessive,"" which you're probably familiar with. It means that it's preferable to have less, rather than pursuing quantity at the expense of quality.
Some might think that this concept isn't particularly suitable for gambling but is more commonly associated with production or office work. However, it's equally applicable in gambling.
In the context of gambling, it essentially means that it's better to forego potential profits than to bet many times without regard for quality in the hope of gaining more. Instead, the focus should be on having fewer, high-quality bets, rather than sheer quantity, aiming for higher efficiency and a higher success rate.
In my earlier days of sports betting, I was one to cast a wide net, solely focused on quantity, as I believed that having more bets would reduce the likelihood of losing bets. However, this approach doesn't have much practical significance. Although the probability of winning and losing in sports betting is roughly equal, it requires a large dataset to demonstrate. Therefore, the few, or even dozens, or hundreds of bets made by regular players are essentially meaningless.
I believe that ""better to be lacking than to be excessive"" is a good habit that prevents many unnecessary financial losses. This habit applies not only to sports betting but also to other forms of gambling, such as baccarat or slot machines. For instance, in the case of slot machines, if you find one that you're doing well on, you might play it several times, but if you feel it's not paying out well or you haven't played it before, you'd generally avoid it.
I'm curious if any of you have similar habits. |
|
Post time 25-10-2023 20:56:12