|
"Real. The player who makes the most turnover is undoubtedly baccarat, which gives the feeling that the dealer is just dealing cards there. A market aunt with a full makeup is naturally more realistic and credible than a cold machine.
Anyway, I don't believe their skills can reach the level of ""Three Immortals Returning to the Cave."" Let's believe in the fairness of this gameplay. But even if you are simply playing probability theory, this routine is enough to strangle you.
Assuming the statistical time is infinite, the number of opening banks and opening players is infinitely close. In actual combat, no matter when you enter, you will find that there is always one that is in the lead in a certain period, either the dealer or the player. This also conforms to the theory of stage deviation. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so many long winning streaks.
My countermeasure is not to look at the road. When I enter at 8 o'clock, I see 28 times for the player and 20 times for the dealer. So in the period from 8 to 9 o'clock, whether it's a dealer's 3-win or a player's 3-win or a dealer and player jumping around, I only bet on the player, and it's an even bet. I will only buy players.
Because the player has created a deviation in this just past period, this deviation exists in a short time. In the next hour, even if the dealer catches up with the player head-on, I won't lose much. If it's still this deviation, I will make a profit. Whether it's a long winning streak for the dealer, a long winning streak for the player, or a perfect match between the dealer and the player, it has nothing to do with me. I don't care at all. Only with a clear mind can you avoid falling for it and survive." |
|