|
Playing 6 decks of cards in baccarat with 40 rounds can result in 40 individual outcomes (win or lose) excluding ties. Calculating the total number of permutations and combinations for this many outcomes is indeed a task best suited for a computer, as it involves a vast number.
Now, if you encounter a "streak of 10 consecutive bankers" at the beginning, and then you have an additional 30 rounds with unknown outcomes, the question is how many possible combinations can result. These calculations are also quite complex and require computer calculations. In terms of probability, it's important to understand that encountering a "streak of 10 consecutive bankers" at the beginning is just one of many possible outcomes within the large number of combinations.
Baccarat played with 6 decks or 8 decks can result in astronomical numbers of combinations. Using 6 decks, the number of possible combinations for the start of a shoe, which consists of 312 cards, is almost 8,000 trillion. It's crucial to note that this 8,000 trillion represents the number of combinations just for the start of a shoe with 6 decks and 312 cards. This becomes even more complex when you factor in situations where a shoe ends, and new decks are introduced, making it a highly dynamic and complex game.
A "streak of 10 consecutive bankers" may seem rare because it has a probability of 1 in 1,024 (1/1024), making it statistically unlikely. However, if you consider this 1/1024 probability within the context of 8,000 trillion possible combinations, it becomes clear that it's just one of the many possible scenarios. Therefore, the 11th outcome should not be any more or less surprising than the 10th outcome. Each has an equal chance of occurring, and both have a 1/2048 probability of happening. The difference is only in the specific sequence of 10 bankers and 1 player that distinguishes these outcomes.
In conclusion, "10 bankers followed by 1 player" has the same probability as "11 consecutive bankers" when considering all possible permutations and combinations. Both scenarios are equally likely and should not be perceived as more or less extraordinary. |
|