My several common tactics and strategies in baccarat.

Isha000

One, go straight for the jugular.

Among my numerous methods, this is the most straightforward and masculine approach. However, there are pros and cons to everything, and the more aggressive the approach, the more vulnerable it is to setbacks. The operation of this method is as follows: start with a base unit and immediately initiate an upward betting strategy after a loss, aiming to use a breakpoint in winning to recoup all funds. But this method is not about winning or losing; there is no concept of winning or losing. Once initiated, it will continue until the goal is achieved. Regardless of the outcome, the bets will never be reduced until the goal is reached. For example: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20... I usually arrange it into 38 steps, and if it doesn't work within 38 steps, I give up. This is a plan that must be prepared in advance, with the goal of using capital effectively and the ability to withstand the pressure of betting. Factors to consider include capital, table limits, and winning percentage. The difference in betting amounts can be adjusted according to your own preferences. The larger the difference, the greater the ability to recoup, but the weaker the ability to withstand the pressure. In my previous post on wheel/roulette combat, I used this method, and the bets at that time were 50, 150, 200, 250, 250. Interested friends can check it out.

There are several variants of this method, let me introduce them.
1. Start with a loss, do not increase the bet, and wait to win a hand before upgrading the bet. The benefit is that if you start with a big loss, you can save a considerable number of bullets for the subsequent attack, accumulating a strong financial strength. This is somewhat similar to the energy distribution strategy in martial arts competitions. This variant is also explained in my previous practical combat posts, so interested friends can review my posts. The formation is -1, -1, -1, -1, -1,..., +1, +2, -3, -4,..., and so on. It keeps going. Compared to the parent method, the ability to recoup is slightly weaker, but it can avoid being slaughtered by a big loss at the beginning. You can also push forward when you win two hands, and the capital will be smoother, but it is not conducive to taking advantage of opportunities.

2. Win in the middle, do not increase the bet. This variant has a similar effect to the previous one, which is to push the bet flat after winning and upgrade it after losing. For friends with a bad heart, you can try this. The formation is -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, +6, +6, -6, -7, +8, +8,..., and so on. The advantage is that the ability to withstand the pressure is acceptable, and the bet will not be lost at a high position. When the bet is at a high level, winning and losing can be offset, and excess wins can offset losses at a low level. Any method requires a certain level of win rate support. When the win rate is around 42%, the bet can be lowered.

3. Start with a loss, upgrade the bet when winning one hand, but do not continue to upgrade. For friends who have a bad heart, you can try this. The formation is -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, +6, +6, -6, -7, +8, +8,..., and so on. The advantage is that it has a strong ability to withstand the pressure and is still possible to recover when there are more losses than wins. The disadvantage is that the win rate is relatively low, and the bet will rise rapidly when you win one hand, but the profit cannot effectively offset the losses of the previous hands. One approach is to increase the difference in betting amounts to overcome this drawback. As long as the win rate slightly regresses, it can be considered a success.

These are the variants I often use. Due to space limitations, I will only introduce these variants for now, but there are many more. Everyone can use their imagination to freely develop methods that are more suitable for themselves. Here is an insert: no matter how the variants change, they are not without their traces. As long as you grasp their characteristics and are familiar with their performance, there is not much room for thinking when you actually play, just like a swordsman, there is no need for too much thought during a duel. Everything is a conditioned reflex, as long as you are familiar with the technique and reach a level of skill where you can do whatever you want, pick up the grass and turn it into a sword, and defeat the enemy invisibly.

Jafar224

With so many methods, it's best to find the one that suits you.

Kahn332

Learning some techniques is also a good idea.