|
"I'm here to have fun. I believe that odds, whether in the form of odds in betting or other contexts, can be both enjoyable and frustrating. The essence of odds lies in quantifying and controlling aspects of static or dynamic entities.
Now, since odds are controlled, they are bound to change. The questions to ponder are:
1. What is the purpose of these changes?
2. How do individuals or entities react to these changes?
People, who are the ones undergoing changes (of course, we're talking about people), will strive to decipher these changes, shifting from being passive to taking an active role. As a result, many individuals have come up with various methods and achieved commendable results through practical application.
The concept of ""initial odds - changing odds - final odds"" might be one way to crack the code. However, when it comes to the odds set by different companies for a single game, and considering that each company has a unique perspective, accurate assessment would require simultaneously tracking at least three different companies. This can be quite challenging.
The nature of odds lies in its malleability and immutability. How can this be understood? Just think of the stability of a triangle, which is the most stable form in plane geometry applications. However, odds setters, such as betting companies, will never let the odds form a stable equilateral triangle; they won't even allow it to become an equilateral triangle with 60-degree angles. They will always find ways to introduce changes. It's precisely these changes that turn odds from ""stable - unstable - stable.""" |
|