|
|
"What are your reasons for betting? What is a good trend? What is a bad trend?
Misconceptions of Linear Thinking!
Most people in the casino notice a scene where a table is crowded with people cheering loudly because a long dragon has appeared or a so-called trend has emerged, such as a symmetrical ""pail"" and so on. The problem is that these are rare opportunities! How long have those people been waiting and how much have they lost? What is a long dragon? 8? 10? 15? Ironically, according to actual tests, a long dragon only appears once every 5 shoes, and to see a long dragon of 10, you need to play 20 shoes, and to see a long dragon of 15, you need 167 shoes. So you can wait patiently. So, should you start chasing after seeing two bankers? To be honest, no matter when you start chasing after seeing how many bankers, your chances of losing are always greater than catching a long dragon. From a mathematical point of view, let's assume you start chasing after seeing two bankers, and your only chance is to keep winning to catch up. The ""total loss"" of doing this. Please note this sentence. The problem is that you may lose because you don't have enough money.
Misconceptions of Linear Thinking: What is a Trend?
Someone once said that the ""trend"" in Baccarat is lagging behind. This is really a word of gold. The trend itself is not wrong, you can follow it, sometimes it will bring you a pleasant surprise, sometimes it will bring you a disaster, right? If you define ""line"" as a horizontal line, or ""horizontal thinking,"" then it's quite different. So, what's a line? Perhaps some people will explain it as a trend. Not really. But the trend itself is not wrong, you can follow it, sometimes it will bring you a pleasant surprise, sometimes it will bring you a disaster, right? If you define ""line"" as a horizontal line, or ""horizontal thinking,"" then it's quite different. Why would I say that the C method will have a chance to win? Because this method is the result of lateral thinking. The design of the stop loss point is determined by your goals and available capital. The best stop code method? I first declare. This is purely my personal opinion, if you have a different opinion, please feel free to propose it.
Regarding the stop code method, some people have said that ""losing is due to the starting capital,"" which is really a word of gold. You will win big in one shoe, but it also means that you may lose big. If your starting capital is enough to bear this risk, you can continue to use it, no problem. But if you have to leave after losing once, you have to think twice. Why did I say that the theory of ""losing should endure, winning should be ruthless"" at the beginning has problems, because it is full of contradictions. To lose the stop loss point and to win the stop loss point are like twin brothers. Losing one of them will make you feel uncomfortable. Only by using them simultaneously will you not be in a hurry. The best stop code method? I first declare. This is purely my personal opinion, if you have a different opinion, please feel free to propose it. The use of the Changjiang code must be negative, win and enter at the same time.
Let me talk about the last one, that is, the surface. Many friends are still circling around the ""point"" now, so naturally the hit rate is low. The good use of the stop code can still be passed by some people. But when you think horizontally, it's different. So, how do we apply these two theories to our actual methods? A method itself, if it doesn't have an effective theoretical basis, it doesn't matter whether you use science, mathematics, data, philosophy, Yijing, etc. But at least it should be able to convince yourself.
Some people have proposed a point-line-plane theory. Let's talk about points and lines now, and talk about the last one. That's right, some people will explain it as a trend. Not really. But the trend itself is not wrong, you can follow it, sometimes it will bring you a pleasant surprise, sometimes it will bring you a disaster, right? If you define ""line"" as a horizontal line, or ""horizontal thinking,"" then it's quite different.
Let me tell you about the best code method in my heart, that is 1114/2228/As for why, I have my own reasons. I use a negative and win-lose strategy, and the winning and winning method is slightly different from Bruce's, but the idea is similar. For example, if my capital is 10W, the base code is 100, each 100 yuan. My goal is to make 3 in each shoe. So when it reaches 10, it will be reorganized and the base will still be 100. But at this time, the base code is 110 yuan each. The advantage of this is that your capital and capital always maintain a kind of linkage. The amount of capital will grow exponentially, and over time, the power will be known. The disadvantage is that you always have these 100 basic codes, so you have to be very careful. The use of the Yangtze River code must be negative, win and enter at the same time.
So when you are thinking horizontally, it's different! A point is enough to avoid the ""pail"" you don't want (none of them is connected), and you save unnecessary funds, which is a kind of exploratory nature. Even if you encounter extremely rare pail roads, such as all players not connecting in the entire shoe, or only two players connecting, the loss will not be too great. If the banker has a connection, it is enough to compensate for the loss." |
|
Post time 4-10-2023 13:25:37
